Enhancing OSH Through Substitution Measures in the Hierarchy of Controls
The many advantages of gas-shielded arc welding processes such as gas metal arc welding (GMAW) or metal active gas (MAG) welding are well-appreciated in the metal fabrication industries. However, the welding fumes generated by these processes are considered hazardous from an occupational safety and health (OSH) perspective. Welding fumes are a complex mixture of particles, with sizes ranging from respirable to inhalable scale. The chemical composition of the fume particles is mainly determined by the metal alloy used in the filler (wire) electrode, since usually over 90% of fume emissions originate from overheating and vaporization of the solid filler in the GMAW / MAG welding arc. While these metal vapors are essential for arc stability, some of them can leave the arc zone and condense, forming welding fume particles.
When GMAW / MAG welding is used, measures need to be implemented to control the hazardous welding fume generated. The avoidance or minimization of human exposure to welding fumes and compliance with local regulations is obviously a high priority. Beyond the regulatory aspect, investments into more effective welding fume prevention can increase the attractiveness of welding companies. In the ongoing competition for qualified welders, a better working environment attracts and safeguards top welding specialists.
The “Hierarchy of Controls”, known as the S.T.O.P. principle in some regions, as illustrated below is a structured OSH methodology guiding companies on how to protect welders against exposure. It ranks control measures based on their general effectiveness, cascading down from elimination of the hazard as the most effective measure at the top. OSH regulations recommend that companies check all measures for applicability, starting from the top of the hierarchy, moving downwards, and combining measures for the best possible reduction of exposure.
As the complete elimination of arc welding is rarely an option in metal fabrication, we focus on the remaining four levels of control measures:
-
Substitution: Use a less-emissive GMAW process, optimizing the welding gas composition, arc parameters and/or filler metallurgy accordingly
-
Technical systems: Capture the fumes, isolate workplaces or ventilate accordingly
-
Organizational: Educate personnel, change behaviors and optimize workplaces
-
Personal protective equipment (PPE): Use powered air purifying respirators (PAPR), helmets, respiratory masks, etc.
All of these measures can contribute to occupational safety and health protection. As recommended by OSH regulations, many operators prefer to combine different measures for the best possible protection of workers. Our PREVENTION LINE of welding gases can reduce metal vapor formation directly at the source - in the arc. This has a knock-on benefit. If the fume emission rate (FER) has been successfully reduced directly at the source, downstream measures like fume extraction or PPE will work more effectively.
The Hierarchy of Controls is a regulatory Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) procedure implemented internationally, with national- or hazard-specific adaptations. The graphic above is proposed by Linde as an informative adaptation, particularly for gas-shielded metal arc welding processes like gas metal arc welding (GMAW), metal-cored arc welding (MCAW) and flux-cored arc welding (FCAW).
Innovative Approach: PREVENTION LINE Welding Gases as Substitution Measure to Reduce FER
We developed our PREVENTION LINE of welding gases specifically to reduce FER at the source, without compromising on weld productivity or quality. As part of this process, we conducted laboratory tests, applying the relevant industry standards to explore the benefits of gases with a higher argon share for GMAW welding of low- and mild-alloyed carbon steels.
Scientific progress in arc physics indicates that a higher carbon dioxide (CO2) content in the welding gas focuses the heat input at the melting tip of the wire, leading to localized overheating. In contrast, higher argon content in our specialized gas mixes can spread the arc heat input over a wider area of the melting wire, reducing localized overheating and the generation of metal vapors.
Measured Reduction in FER Using PREVENTION LINE Gases for GMAW of Mild-/Low-alloyed Steels
GMAW of carbon steel with spray arc at 10 m/min (394 ipm), WFS 1.2 mm solid wire G3Si1 (ER70S-6). Fume emission measurement according to ISO 15011-1. Only Linde gas products tested. Data source: Linde Technology Arc Welding Laboratory.
Wider Benefits of PREVENTION LINE Gases
Not only are substitution measures with our PREVENTION LINE of gases positioned towards the top of the OSH hierarchy, but the use of gases with a lower CO2 content can offer a broad range of advantages compared with shielding gases with a higher CO2 content:
- OSH: Lower welding fume emission rates
- Productivity: Less spatter and oxides, resulting in less post-processing effort
- Quality: Deposited weld material shows better metallurgical properties with less alloying element burn-off
-
Sustainability: Less fugitive CO2 emissions (Scope 1) released in the welding process
PREVENTION LINE Gases in Action
Video above illustrates the visible reduction in fume emission rate (FER) achievable using PREVENTION LINE gases for GMAW of mild-/low-alloyed steels, with the left image based on an industry-standard C25 gas and the right image based on CORGON® 8/ MIGMIX GOLD™
Useful Tips: Fine-tuning Gas, Filler and Equipment Settings when Working with the PREVENTION LINE
Our research focuses not only on the gas impact, but also on the interdependencies between all variables. Our experts explore ways of fine-tuning these variables to help you meet your productivity and quality goals. In the following, you will find some useful tips.
Optimizing both arc transfer mode and gas may increase the benefit
- Check if spray arc can be substituted by pulsed arc or lower-energy arc types
At a set wire feed rate, the arc length will change if the gas composition changes
- Adjust arc parameters, e.g. voltage
Modern synergic power sources use proprietary arc control software, which can react differently to a gas change
- Check if your welding equipment already offers optimized parameters for Linde gases listed here
Weld quality control and documentation depend on the industry branch, applied standards and company procedures
- Check your weld job specification for what needs to be re-evaluated when implementing a gas optimization
Video above illustrates the impact of PREVENTION LINE gases on the visible fume emission rate (FER) when using C18 gas in a spray arc and a PREVENTION LINE mix with a higher argon content in a pulse arc